用户注册 登录
珍珠湾全球网 返回首页

岳东晓 -- 珍珠湾全球网 ... http://ydx.zzwave.com [收藏] [复制] [分享] [RSS] 岳东晓 -- 珍珠湾全球网

日志

给SCA5限制华人法案提案议员的信(草稿)

热度 5已有 9966 次阅读2014-3-1 02:19 |个人分类:法律|系统分类:SCA5限华法案

Dear State (Senator Hernandez/____)/(Assembly Member ___),


Almost ten years have passed since the State legislature first considered bills to permit racial preferences in public education in 2004. During that time, Latino enrollment in the U.C. has grown from 24,771 in 2003 to 41,810 in 2012, percentagewise, from 12.59% to 19.2% of the U.C. domestic student body (data source: http://legacy-its.ucop.edu/uwnews/stat/ ). Latino students are doing better at school year over year.


So, please don't give up on them so easily. They don't need racial tickets. They just need to study a bit harder, get a high school diploma, and complete the prerequisite courses for attending a university. I know quite a few Latinos, they are honest, smart and work very hard. If Latinos really want to do something, they can achieve it by their own effort.


As the attached paper shows, since Latino girls are doing 60% better than Latino boys, all you need to do is to help the boys study more. There are attendance laws that require students to study. By enforcing these existing laws, we should see substantial improvement in the U.C. enrollment rate for Latinos. There is no need to institutionalize racial discrimination in the State Constitution in any shape or form.


It is an odious and ominous proposition to permit racial discrimination by the State. SCA5 reminds us of the 1879 California Constitution, which had a discriminatory section titled "CHINESE" in it. SCA5 makes a lot of people having sleepless nights, some preparing to struggle against it, others fearful of a future when constitutional rights of minorities are trampled through democratic processes . SCA5 violates Equal Protection and is very dangerous to the racially diverse California.


 

Please withdraw/STOP SCA5.

 

Than you for your consideration.


路过

鸡蛋
2

鲜花
1

支持

雷人

难过

搞笑

刚表态过的朋友 (3 人)

 

发表评论 评论 (5 个评论)

回复 VANO 2014-3-1 03:04
  
回复 中西部网客 2014-3-1 03:11
在思考,Hernandez 很狡猾,他并没有把任何种族歧视的文字加进SCA5,只是把 Prop 209 中的 public education 给拿掉了,他也多次强调不会用配额,只是让教育部门自己决定,因此万一走到公投通过,必须采取法律诉讼时,指控SCA5种族歧视违宪可能会被认定为 unfounded,给议员的信是否加上 Dr. Hernandez 多次强调他的动机是大学招"Qualified,best and brightest candidates",他的提案完全是多此一举,Leave the job to universities admission officers, they are more qualified than any of us. 如果动机是把 non-qualified or under-qualified candidates 硬塞进加洲公立大学,既是对有限资源的浪费,也是违宪行为。
回复 岳东晓 2014-3-1 03:12
中西部网客: 在思考,Hernandez 很狡猾,他并没有把任何种族歧视的文字加进SCA5,只是把 Prop 209 中的 public education 给拿掉了,他也多次强调不会用配额,只是让教育部 ...
不一定是狡猾。他们之前已经在议会通过允许考虑种族的法案,但被州长们依据宪法否决了。这次,他们想干脆先把宪法改了,然后那些种族法案就可以畅通无阻。
回复 乔雨风 2014-3-1 05:56
First, I applaud you for taking the time to research the issue and draft the letter. It won’t hurt for anybody who wants to voice their opinion to use this letter.
Personally, I sense that the tune is a little condescending. My two cents.
回复 稻草 2014-3-1 09:08
很好,有理有据,切中要害。

facelist

您需要登录后才可以评论 登录 | 用户注册

Archiver|手机版|珍珠湾全球网

GMT+8, 2019-10-23 10:02 , Processed in 0.022274 second(s), 9 queries , Apc On.

Powered by Discuz! X2.5

回顶部